Immigration, Asylum, and National Identity
In an increasingly globalized world, the movement of people across borders sparks intense political warfare. Do wealthy nations have a moral obligation to accept those fleeing war and poverty? Or does a nation have the absolute right to protect its culture, economy, and security by closing its gates? In this unit, we explore the vocabulary of prejudice, integration, and survival.
1. The government decided to use the immigrant population as a to distract from their own economic failures.
2. Millions of people fled the war zone, creating the largest crisis in modern history.
3. Without legal work permits, workers are often heavily exploited by corrupt employers.
4. He faced immediate after his visa expired and his appeal was denied.
5. Racism in the justice system isn't just about a few bad individuals; the bias is deeply .
6. Providing free language classes to newcomers greatly speeds up their into the community.
When discussing national borders and cultural mixing, politicians and the public frequently use these polarizing phrases.
Read about a clash between international human rights law and national sovereignty.
Following a violent military coup in a neighboring nation, thousands of desperate families fled to the border, seeking asylum. The host country, however, ordered the military to shut the gates. The Prime Minister gave a speech claiming that letting them in would open the floodgates, ruin the economy, and destroy the country's national identity. Critics immediately accused him of weaponizing xenophobia and treating the refugees as scapegoats.
The situation escalated when an international human rights tribunal intervened. The tribunal demanded that the borders be opened immediately. They insisted that it is crucial that no refugee be turned away to face certain death. The host nation’s government pushed back, stating that while they sympathize, it is vital that a sovereign nation protect its own citizens first. The legal standoff left thousands stranded in the freezing cold.
When reporting formal commands, legal demands, or vital recommendations, native speakers use the Subjunctive Mood. In this structure, the verb inside the "that" clause remains in its base form (infinitive without 'to'), no matter who the subject is.
| Trigger Words | Incorrect (Normal Mood) ❌ | Correct (Subjunctive Mood) ✅ |
|---|---|---|
| Demand that... | The UN demands that the border is opened. | The UN demands that the border be opened. |
| Insist that... | They insisted that he assimilates. | They insisted that he assimilate. (No 's' on he/she/it) |
| It is vital/crucial that... | It is vital that she doesn't face deportation. | It is vital that she not face deportation. |
Pro Tip: The subjunctive sounds extremely formal, but it is absolutely necessary when debating legal human rights, tribunal orders, and official policy recommendations.
1. The international court ruled against the Prime Minister and demanded that the refugees ____________ granted immediate asylum.
2. To prevent exploitation in the workplace, it is crucial that an undocumented worker ____________ basic legal rights.
Type the missing words to complete these heavy idioms.
1. By denying them the right to vote, the government effectively turned them into second-class .
2. The country lost its best doctors and engineers during the war, suffering a massive brain .
Don't just nod your head in conversations. Master the advanced phrasing to eloquently defend your opinions in high-level debates.
Come and join me for a bespoke English lesson at nativeuk.com designed specifically to build your conversational confidence.
Book a Private SessionWant to speak clearly about politics, tech, and the modern world? We've got the secret vocabulary you won't find in textbooks.
Check out our Good to Know section and dive into our Blog. You’ll be leading conversations like a native speaker in no time.
Explore Free Resources