Youth Crime, Justice, and Responsibility
When an adult commits murder, society demands strong justice. But what happens when the killer is 11 years old? Do we focus on punishing the criminal, or getting psychological help for the child? In this unit, we dive into the dark reality of youth crime, exploring the heavy legal vocabulary used in courtrooms to decide if a child truly understands the meaning of death.
1. Because of the brutal nature of the crime, the prosecutor wants the 15-year-old to face a serious adult .
2. The judge handed down a harsh life with no chance of getting out.
3. This wasn't an accident; the evidence proves the attack was cold and carefully .
4. Many psychologists argue that long-term only turns teenagers into hardened adult criminals.
5. After serving 15 years and showing good behaviour, he was granted early by the board.
6. To protect them from angry locals, the law grants lifelong to child killers when they go back to society.
7. The jury looked at the evidence and decided that the young boy was of murder.
8. It is very controversial to send a offender to lock-up with full-grown men.
When the public debates crime and punishment, they often use these polarizing idioms to express their desire for severe justice or human mercy.
Read this story of a highly controversial court case.
The nation was divided when two 12-year-old boys were found guilty of a horrific, planned murder. Outside the court, angry crowds shouted that the boys should be treated like adults. "If you do the crime, you do the time!" one person yelled, demanding the judge completely lock them up and forget them.
Inside, the lawyers argued that the boys were heavily affected by their terrible environment, growing up in violent homes. They explained that at 12 years old, the human brain is not fully grown, so the boys didn't truly understand what death meant. They asked the judge to send the boys to a secure hospital for therapy.
The prosecution argued that a few years in therapy was too weak for taking a life. The judge finally decided the boys deserved to go to a high-security prison for bad teenagers until they were adults, when they could ask for an early release.
When discussing the legal system, we often focus on what happens to the criminal, rather than who is doing the punishing. To do this, we use the passive forms of infinitives and gerunds.
| Form | Structure | Courtroom Example |
|---|---|---|
| Passive Infinitive | to be + Past Participle (V3) | "The crowd demanded the boys to be tried as adults." (Follows verbs like want, need, deserve, demand). |
| Passive Gerund | being + Past Participle (V3) | "He is terrified of being sentenced to life in prison." (Follows prepositions or verbs like avoid, fear, hate). |
1. The defence lawyer argued that the 12-year-old didn't deserve ____________ to a maximum-security adult prison.
2. The young boy cried in court, terrified of ____________ locked away forever.
Type the missing words to complete these conversational idioms.
1. Five years in a youth hospital for murder is just a slap on the .
2. They didn't have a chance in life; their violent behaviour makes them a product of their .
Before you debate, look at these points and use the sentence starters below.
Don't just nod your head in conversations. Master the advanced phrasing to eloquently defend your opinions in high-level debates.
Come and join me for a bespoke English lesson at nativeuk.com designed specifically to build your conversational confidence.
Book a Private SessionWant to speak clearly about politics, tech, and the modern world? We've got the secret vocabulary you won't find in textbooks.
Check out our Good to Know section and dive into our Blog. You’ll be leading conversations like a native speaker in no time.
Explore Free Resources