Genetic Engineering, Eugenics, and Bioethics
Editing human genes to prevent a child from inheriting a deadly disease sounds like a medical miracle. But what happens when parents want to use the same technology to make their child taller, smarter, or more athletic? In this unit, we discuss the ethical nightmare of genetic engineering and the terrifying history of trying to create the "perfect" human.
1. By editing the human , scientists believe they can cure hereditary illnesses before a child is even born.
2. Critics argue that selecting babies for their eye colour or intelligence is just a modern, high-tech version of .
3. If we can successfully conditions like cystic fibrosis from the gene pool, do we not have a moral obligation to do so?
4. During the IVF process, the doctor screened the to ensure it was healthy before implanting it.
5. He is genetically to heart disease because both his father and grandfather suffered from it.
6. Athletic ability isn't determined by a single gene; it is a highly complex physical .
When society discusses the consequences of meddling with science and nature, these heavy idioms are frequently used.
Read this hypothetical scenario that might soon become a reality. Where do you draw the line?
David and Elena sit in the pristine office of a private fertility clinic. They are both carriers of the gene for Huntington’s disease, a devastating and fatal neurological condition. Through IVF and genetic screening, the doctor assures them they can weed out any embryos carrying the mutation. For this, they are incredibly grateful.
But then the doctor slides a sleek digital tablet across the desk. "While we are editing the genome," the doctor smiles, "we offer premium enhancement packages. For an additional $20,000, we can ensure your child is not predisposed to obesity. For $50,000, we can select the traits for above-average height and blue eyes. And for $100,000, we can apply cognitive boosters to increase their baseline IQ."
Elena is horrified, accusing the doctor of practicing eugenics and tampering with nature. David, however, hesitates. "If other parents are buying these upgrades for their kids," he argues, "our child will be left behind. It won't be a level playing field anymore. We have to give them the best start in life."
When debating the future of science, we need to distinguish between actions that will be in progress at a future time, and actions that will be completed by a future time.
| Tense | Structure | Bioethics Example |
|---|---|---|
| Future Continuous | will be + verb-ing | "In twenty years, wealthy parents will be buying better DNA for their children." (An action in progress in the future). |
| Future Perfect | will have + Past Participle (V3) | "By 2050, scientists will have eradicated genetic blindness." (An action completed before a specific future time). |
1. I fear that by the end of the century, humanity ____________ a biological underclass of people who couldn't afford genetic upgrades.
2. "Don't worry," the doctor said, "At 10:00 AM tomorrow, we ____________ the healthy embryo into the uterus."
Type the missing words to complete these heavy idioms.
1. If we allow parents to choose eye colour today, what will they choose tomorrow? It is a very slippery .
2. Editing human DNA to create super-soldiers or geniuses is essentially opening Pandora's .
Don't just nod your head in conversations. Master the advanced phrasing to eloquently defend your opinions in high-level debates.
Come and join me for a bespoke English lesson at nativeuk.com designed specifically to build your conversational confidence.
Book a Private SessionWant to speak clearly about politics, tech, and the modern world? We've got the secret vocabulary you won't find in textbooks.
Check out our Good to Know section and dive into our Blog. You’ll be leading conversations like a native speaker in no time.
Explore Free Resources