Juvenile Justice & Moral Culpability
When an adult commits murder, society demands justice. But what happens when the killer is 11 years old? Do we focus on punishing the criminal, or rehabilitating the child? In this unit, we dive into the dark reality of juvenile crime, exploring the heavy legal vocabulary used in courtrooms to decide if a child truly understands the finality of death.
1. Because of the brutal nature of the crime, the prosecutor wants the 15-year-old to be as an adult.
2. The judge handed down a harsh life with no possibility of release.
3. This wasn't an accident; the evidence proves the attack was cold and .
4. Many psychologists argue that long-term only turns juvenile delinquents into hardened adult criminals.
5. After serving 15 years and showing remorse, he was granted by the board.
6. To protect them from vigilante justice, the law grants lifelong to child killers when they are released.
When the public debates crime and punishment, they often use these polarizing idioms to express their desire for justice or mercy.
Read this fictionalized account of a highly controversial sentencing.
The nation was divided when two 12-year-old boys were found guilty of a horrific, premeditated murder. Outside the courthouse, angry crowds gathered, demanding that the boys be treated like adults. "If you do the crime, you do the time!" one protestor shouted, demanding the judge throw away the key.
Inside, the defence lawyers argued that the boys were a product of their environment—raised in severe abuse and neglect. They argued that at 12 years old, the human brain is not fully developed, and the boys lacked the true moral culpability to understand the finality of death. They begged the judge to allow the boys to be rehabilitated in a secure psychiatric facility.
The prosecution countered that granting them a few years in therapy would be nothing more than a slap on the wrist for taking a life. The judge ultimately ruled that due to the severity of the crime, the boys deserved to be incarcerated in a high-security youth prison until they reached adulthood, at which point they could apply for parole under strict anonymity.
When discussing the legal system, we often focus on what happens to the criminal, rather than who is doing the punishing. To do this, we use the passive forms of infinitives and gerunds.
| Form | Structure | Courtroom Example |
|---|---|---|
| Passive Infinitive | to be + Past Participle (V3) | "The crowd demanded the boys to be tried as adults." (Follows verbs like want, need, deserve, demand). |
| Passive Gerund | being + Past Participle (V3) | "He is terrified of being sentenced to life in prison." (Follows prepositions or verbs like avoid, fear, resent). |
1. The defence lawyer argued that the 12-year-old didn't deserve ____________ to a maximum-security adult prison.
2. The young defendant cried in court, terrified of ____________ locked away forever.
Type the missing words to complete these conversational idioms.
1. Five years in a youth facility for murder is just a slap on the .
2. They didn't have a chance in life; their violent behaviour makes them a product of their .
Don't just nod your head in conversations. Master the advanced phrasing to eloquently defend your opinions in high-level debates.
Come and join me for a bespoke English lesson at nativeuk.com designed specifically to build your conversational confidence.
Book a Private SessionWant to speak clearly about politics, tech, and the modern world? We've got the secret vocabulary you won't find in textbooks.
Check out our Good to Know section and dive into our Blog. You’ll be leading conversations like a native speaker in no time.
Explore Free Resources